Back   Pokemon GO Bot Forum |WoW Forum | WoW FairPlay Bot Forum > World of Glider Bots > Ban Forum
Search Today's posts Mark all forums as read EnglishTranslations

Advertising
Similar threads
Theme Author Forum Reply Last post
Permanent spell Dennish90 General, questions, bugs or problems 11 10/11/2010 09:51
Permanent ban raphack Ban Forum 28 03/23/2009 19: 30
permanent ban on 19.12. Seth Ban Forum 9 December 29, 2008 16: 54
Permanent ban 19:05 solarus Ban Forum 3 May 21, 2008 09:08
Permanent ban on 23:04 HenniMenni26'5 Ban Forum 12 05.05.2008 17: 57
Response
 
Theme options View
Spell at 02:10:08 permanently Main Acc
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Registered since: Aug 2007
Contributions: 16
 
Members

Offline
Spell at 02:10:08 permanently Main Acc -Posted: 02.10.2008
Day of bans: 02.10.08
Online / Offline: Offline
AFK: No
Contact GM: No
Email received: Yes
Shadow Mode: Yes
Log Settings: 15 min
Glider Version: 1.71
Glider Elite / Normal: Normal
Additional Info: My Main Acc was banned today. I never let the gliding. I only have a 2nd Acc gliding here and there and from there via guild bank or Face to Face getranst transfer gold on my main.
Reply with quote
Avatar from Google AdSense
Registered since: much too long
Contributions: far too many...
Location: everywhere...
 
Google AdSense

Online now!
Posted: recently


 
ALT 02.10.2008
Registered since: Sep 2008
Contributions: 50
 
Grunts

Offline
And why was he banned? What is in the mail?
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Registered since: Sep 2008
Contributions: 62
 
Members

Offline
Ban Reason would be too interesting to know. Was it because of the gold due to transfer or 3rd party programs?
Anarek botting's status:
Tauren Warrior:____64/70 - Stopped!
Orc Hunter:________33/70 - Stopped!
Undead Priest:_____01/70 - Not started yet!
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Avatar by Cabius
Registered since: May 2007
Contributions: 131
 
Members

Offline
condolences for your first main, but what about your farmacc? is the still?
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Registered since: 27 Aug 2008
Contributions: 217
 
Members

Offline
I'd also be interested in the basic
With the help + rep not forget, they also distribute so happy
THANK BOT
Owner of a beta-keys
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Avatar by xanef
Registered since: Jan 2008
Contributions: 346
Location: Düsseldorf
 
Members

Offline
Reason to know would not hurt either.
I first looked at me like, all as yet.
Dwarf/Hunterr 85 on
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, and then win you. / M.Gandhi
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Registered since: Sep 2008
Contributions: 62
 
Members

Offline
I suspect it is the transfer of gold ... The best is still just over the AH, although a small amount is lost. But a closer consider the TE really nice ...
Anarek botting's status:
Tauren Warrior:____64/70 - Stopped!
Orc Hunter:________33/70 - Stopped!
Undead Priest:_____01/70 - Not started yet!
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Registered since: Sep 2008
Contributions: 40
Location: Hamburch
 
Grunts

Offline
Question in any case after which char should have gebottet when. Then you can see what you can do. Do this in writing in any case.

Ifs should be at the gold, enough for the Glidden Acc. surely be down too ... does not seem to be.
I help, then pleased a + rep!

Last edited by Northern War (02.10.2008 to 19: 40 (Watch)
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Registered since: Mar 2007
Contributions: 187
 
Stone guard

Offline
I always finds so funny someone says "why you would have been banned due to mad" and then write 4328723456 nommel people ... oO OMG
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Registered since: 27 Aug 2008
Contributions: 217
 
Members

Offline
lol dnd, I wanted to test Eigl even if the highly screwed my contributions, and it did this ^ ^ I'm sure that area we rank with no premiums, as is most often before discussion only and meaningful contributions even twice does not count either, though I will help beginners to such ppather * And they are lazy * + rep
With the help + rep not forget, they also distribute so happy
THANK BOT
Owner of a beta-keys
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Registered since: Aug 2007
Contributions: 16
 
Members

Offline
Yes, the farm is still Acc .. this is indeed the funny ..

Here is the text of the mail:



Day of the offense: Determination completed on 02/10/2008
Occurred: failure of the server economy and involvement in online trading with the property of Blizzard Entertainment
Action: Permanently disabled account

We regret that we had to take this measure. However, it is in the interest of the world of Warcraft Community and the integrity of the game, that you will be revoked access to the world of Warcraft servers.

Online trading involves not only the sale or purchase of gold and items for real money, but also includes the use of so-called "power leveling" a service, but is not limited thereto.

Furthermore, access to other clauses of which are directed against so-called account sharing. Access to the account is subject solely the responsibility of the owner and so-called account sharing is against our terms of use (World of Warcraft Europe-> legal-> terms of use). For this reason, the blocking of the account will remain in force even if you feel that you have not even committed these violations of our policies. Our sanctions are directed more against the account, but not against the owner.
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Registered since: Sep 2008
Contributions: 62
 
Members

Offline
So because of the gold ... but because of Could well be that your Farmacc will eventually also not yet vested.

Change in future cash over the AH!
Anarek botting's status:
Tauren Warrior:____64/70 - Stopped!
Orc Hunter:________33/70 - Stopped!
Undead Priest:_____01/70 - Not started yet!
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Registered since: Sep 2008
Contributions: 40
Location: Hamburch
 
Grunts

Offline
@ Hblockx .... yes exactly, because in life it is so important here on the board to have 200 posts ...

I think that is really spannand what Blizz would write NEM lawyer. I suspect that they - before they risk a lawsuit, and one probably. stated explicitly to demonstrate how and when they have detected an AGB-offense - the Ace. revive.

You can now all laugh and shake my head, but in court you can Nich's just say there was already something ... bla bla bla ... but horse and rider ought to call it ... ie on 02.10.2008 at 14.18 clock this and that and determined by the method.

Deputy announces Just think, it would be your rent and the landlord without notice to you with NEN standard email ... has been ne other explosive.
Unfortunately, no one way to get a lawyer to ask me.
I help, then pleased a + rep!
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Registered since: Jan 2008
Contributions: 350
 
Warlord

Offline
at best you're buying a new acc and can quickly make a guild banks where you have obtained the gold lagerst if there is a lot ^ ^ =)
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Registered since: 27 Aug 2008
Contributions: 391
 
Warlord

Offline
I would not even say this is the new way of Blizz and no one understands them.
Myself have suffered a lot by now, even the NIE's Ace! Have sent gold sold or bought! Even non lvl 70, it is to the wildest theories.
It burns me to the animal soul, because I'd really like to go to the lawyer and what to do. Because I know myself that this is so and the reasons can not absolutely agree.

You stand there and can do nothing that pisses me off to Sun immensely, even though you're right.
Next Banwave inc: still 1-4 months

I ´ m back! When comes the next wave
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Avatar of mufu
Registered since: Jul 2007
Contributions: 247
Location: Shattrath city
 
Members

Offline
Quote:
Originally posted by Guadeloupe Post show
@ Hblockx .... yes exactly, because in life it is so important here on the board to have 200 posts ...

I think that is really spannand what Blizz would write NEM lawyer. I suspect that they - before they risk a lawsuit, and one probably. stated explicitly to demonstrate how and when they have detected an AGB-offense - the Ace. revive.

You can now all laugh and shake my head, but in court you can Nich's just say there was already something ... bla bla bla ... but horse and rider ought to call it ... ie on 02.10.2008 at 14.18 clock this and that and determined by the method.

Deputy announces Just think, it would be your rent and the landlord without notice to you with NEN standard email ... has been ne other explosive.
Unfortunately, no one way to get a lawyer to ask me.
These are two different pairs of shoes.

WoW -> Services
Home -> tenancy

-mufu


Was my post helpful? Then please click here
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Registered since: 27 Aug 2008
Contributions: 71
 
Members

Offline
Hort to whinen on - at least a few days after the WotLK release get updated very often ne new ban wave, and we have lost everything anyway
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
View jofe
Registered since: 27 Aug 2008
Contributions: 6
 
Members

Offline
Quote:
Originally posted by Thor Post show
Hort to whinen on - at least a few days after the WotLK release get updated very often ne new ban wave, and we have lost everything anyway
which is good . could even pass very well.
Reply with quote
 
ALT 02.10.2008
Avatar by DRonin
Registered since: Feb 2008
Contributions: 148
Location: caught in the Undercity
 
Members

Offline
Quote:
Originally posted by Anarek Post show
Change in future cash over the AH!
The AH will definitely be seen here is logged and gold Change
Even more striking, and faster to understand than Face2Face
and from this can only be discouraged!
signed DRonin - walkin in a brainfucked world
Solo Gilding: Hunter level 70 just farming
Party gliding: Shaman level 23 22 k / h

Standard - the new standard
Reply with quote
 
ALT October 15, 2008
Registered since: 27 Aug 2008
Contributions: 2
 
Newbie

Offline
as I know Blizzard wait but only for the moment we buy our woltk and enable us banish After this you then then they have earned heaps of money NEN

Last edited by x3r0 (15.10.2008 to 08: 27 (Watch)
Reply with quote
 
ALT October 15, 2008
Registered since: 27 Aug 2008
Contributions: 377
 
Members

Offline
Quote:
Originally posted by Guadeloupe Post show
@ Hblockx .... yes exactly, because in life it is so important here on the board to have 200 posts ...

I think that is really spannand what Blizz would write NEM lawyer. I suspect that they - before they risk a lawsuit, and one probably. stated explicitly to demonstrate how and when they have detected an AGB-offense - the Ace. revive.

You can now all laugh and shake my head, but in court you can Nich's just say there was already something ... bla bla bla ... but horse and rider ought to call it ... ie on 02.10.2008 at 14.18 clock this and that and determined by the method.

Deputy announces Just think, it would be your rent and the landlord without notice to you with NEN standard email ... has been ne other explosive.
Unfortunately, no one way to get a lawyer to ask me.
So ....

Yes and no ...
An apartment and a WoW subscription are not comparable because of the different laws.

But for an extraordinary termination of a subscription must also be submitted substantial evidence. But that applies to the word "Exceptionally". that is not even that your subscription then life continues.
Here is this match but then again. Even if the landlord is not an extraordinary notice of cancellation is approved, the whole shall be considered proper notice with the appropriate notice period.

So and here starts the tricky situation:

Your attorney can take action against the extraordinary, will mean you can either repeat the lost playing time to the end of the billing period or already debited according to the fees you have paid for it (yes, of course, with the fillet interest).
But Blizzard has you still terminated at the end of the billing period. and Blizzard has the right to deny another subscription.

So to all wiseacres for a lawyer and this: The Ace is the medium and long gone. ALWAYS. Just as you can cancel a subscription to the accounting period end (and at any time, nor even the day before), as well as Blizzard has this right.

And that's why a claim is total nonsense. In the worst case you incur losses of 65 € for half a year. Since Perhaps now is the lawsuit. Because probably 12 euros less. And other related damages can not argue. Because the sale of the account or something is forbidden, and would undermine your testimony in court rather than support.

So please:

SAVES YOU THE SHIT WITH THE ATTORNEY NEM AFTER blubbering!!!
You knew everything you do. and like the looks of Blizz's reasoning but does not really matter. We failed each time to the terms and conditions. From end of it. No Geweine and blubbering. Everyone here knows of what he is getting into.
I regret any account of the lost, and I have a little compassion. Because it just puts a little heart inside blood. But no longer.

Ps: Probably will Blizz just a spin on the standard letter in, and the gold sellers banned for Bottens.
Warlock gliding:
1----10----20 - 30-40-50-60-.–70-80 (still not unlocked)
1----10----20 - 30-40-50-60-70-80 (still not unlocked)
Reply with quote
 
ALT October 15, 2008
Avatar by sirius
Registered since: Jul 2008
Contributions: 99
Location: Bavaria
 
Members

Offline
this message because blizzard of commercial ... is actually the net if you NEN account on ebay purchases and is then caught?
Reply with quote
 
ALT October 15, 2008
Avatar by trulala
Registered since: Dec 2007
Contributions: 2.151
Location: Berlin
 
Members

Offline
The Blizzard are the Chars, accounts, gold, items, and do all the things that otherwise can buy ingame so you get something. and all you get ingame and have it paid for with Gelf rl belongs to Blizzard and it is forbidden to act ^ ^
Reply with quote
 
ALT October 15, 2008
Registered since: Sep 2008
Contributions: 40
Location: Hamburch
 
Grunts

Offline
@ Screwedx

1) Just relax little time NEN at your choice of words.

2) to be paid monthly Nen Acc. That ensures no wrongdoing on the part of the user could "indefinitely" has passed, what has ala of NEM continuing obligation lease termination options on the part of the regular Blizz would certainly be worth considering times.

3) Was there enough cases here that have not just in his own words geglidet. I remember father whose daughter has grouped into geglidet well on the PC should ... and so on are thus phrases like ... YOU HAVE IT ALL BUT YOU KNOW ... not always be appropriate.

4) to reach lawyers often have little without a strong legal position because of pressure alone, may prove decidedly court to consider when the misconduct was of a user and how this behavior was registered to the realization on the part of Blizz CAN show, the Acc. to let them live yet.
For the BURDEN OF PROOF RULE says: who wants to take the legal consequence of a standard claim for themselves, must prove the existence of their offenses.
Have translated means, Blizz do if I deny geglidet to prove the violation decidedly, day time, etc. AND if "caught" denies that the method used is suitable to determine a breach Conditions, disclose under circumstances such as the alleged violation have found. If Blizz really wants .... mhm.

5) I do not realize that many pro-gliders her farm Acc. This effort is not worth. A father whose daughter one probably. geglidet has, this effort may not be too much ... Therefore, not strutting about of the same all over! Everyone must make the decision themselves. But the fact remains:

6) The fact that such a process would certainly be interesting, both legally as well as the outcome. And wow circuits could possibly find similar attention to the trial of the Glider developers.

So long

my 2 cents
I help, then pleased a + rep!

Last edited by Northern War (15.10.2008 to 10: 47 (Watch)
Reply with quote
 
ALT October 15, 2008
Registered since: 27 Aug 2008
Contributions: 377
 
Members

Offline
Quote:
Originally posted by Guadeloupe Post show
@ Screwedx

1) Just relax little time NEN at your choice of words.

2) to be paid monthly Nen Acc. That ensures no wrongdoing on the part of the user could "indefinitely" has passed, what has ala of NEM continuing obligation lease termination options on the part of the regular Blizz would certainly be worth considering times.

3) Was there enough cases here that have not just in his own words geglidet. I remember father whose daughter has grouped into geglidet well on the PC should ... and so on are thus phrases like ... YOU HAVE IT ALL BUT YOU KNOW ... not always be appropriate.

4) to reach lawyers often have little without a strong legal position because of pressure alone, may prove decidedly court to consider when the misconduct was of a user and how this behavior was registered to the realization on the part of Blizz CAN show, the Acc. to let them live yet.
For the BURDEN OF PROOF RULE says: who wants to take the legal consequence of a standard claim for themselves, must prove the existence of their offenses.
Have translated means, Blizz do if I deny geglidet to prove the violation decidedly, day time, etc. AND if "caught" denies that the method used is suitable to determine a breach Conditions, disclose under circumstances such as the alleged violation have found. If Blizz really wants .... mhm.

5) I do not realize that many pro-gliders her farm Acc. This effort is not worth. A father whose daughter one probably. geglidet has, this effort may not be too much ... Therefore, not strutting about of the same all over! Everyone must make the decision themselves. But the fact remains:

6) The fact that such a process would certainly be interesting, both legally as well as the outcome. And wow circuits could possibly find similar attention to the trial of the Glider developers.

So long

my 2 cents
your designs are beautiful and well ...

But ... (A big fat but):

1) I have yet ...

2) well, the contract law should not be penalized. and no, that has NOTHING to do with the tenancy ... The name says it all. Here different application of justice. If you can announce to you Blizz can also terminate. So simple. Normally, you announced any. (At no subscription) but it would be possible ...

3) Well, make me a break ... Who says in NEM Botter forum geglidet he had never ... Sorry ... * No comment *

4) Again, the attorney certainly achieved what ... So it was not ... It was about WHAT is going against the law. And he can proceed only against the "extraordinary termination without refund of the cost." So against the extraordinary and the reimbursement of costs by the end of the billing period. That's what you paid and yes yes you is also because you can no longer use. This is not to debate whether you gebottet or net ... (At least for now). A contract can not be simply dismissed so without reimbursement.
Blizz's account may still end with the current billing period just simply shut down .. That would be an interesting process, but see no way to get directly to their success here.

This paragraph is extremely important because not everything is the same.

5) based on 3) and 4). if I paid 65 euros for NEN six months in advance and three days later, I'm spellbound I'm sure because of the 65 € for the lawyer ... But if I have a monthly subscription and three days before month end will be banned .. well, worth € 2 for the net ...

6) As I said here, it's not a process but at least 2 different methods. And the last one (Blizz can terminate properly) would certainly be interesting ...

So please read first, and try to understand. This can not all be lumped together.
Warlock gliding:
1----10----20 - 30-40-50-60-.–70-80 (still not unlocked)
1----10----20 - 30-40-50-60-70-80 (still not unlocked)
Reply with quote
 
ALT October 15, 2008
Avatar by Lazzmania
Registered since: Mar 2008
Contributions: 623
Location: Witten
 
Members

Offline
Quote:
3) Was there enough cases here that have not just in his own words geglidet
hihihi

I'm with his colleagues, the tracking patrol with the police ...
The clientele is also the only really "nothing" has made .. NEVER! ^ ^ * G *

'd Got to think about

Quote:
4) to reach lawyers often have little without a strong legal position because of pressure alone, may prove decidedly court to consider when the misconduct was of a user and how this behavior was recorded
And precisely for this reason is the rationale of the ban now, never 3rd. Party but gold trading.
3rd. Party to prove, would disclose methods are called .. Gold is trading: Day - A Time Account Amount X is an Account instance. enough justification

Quote:
lead to the conclusion by Blizz CAN, the Acc. to let them live yet.
Yes, then come for inspection, to let you play because the German law nor paid for the time more ... and when the time is up to you to terminate normally and it would say no more interest in another business relationship with you ... Is the same in green, with 2 weeks more playing time.

GreeTz
Learned when Yoda, you have grammar!

Last edited by Lazzmania (15.10.2008 to 11:29 (Watch)
Reply with quote
 
ALT October 15, 2008
Registered since: Sep 2008
Contributions: 40
Location: Hamburch
 
Grunts

Offline
@ Screwedx
.. In this case the rent law will not apply here, I am well known. It was an example to illustrate.
However, since there are many continuing obligations (contracts for an stimmee time) limitations of the ordinary rights of termination, such a thing can certainly be conceivable. Where I admit that many Eischränkungen exist in areas of life that have a clearly fortuitous significance, as the gamble on the Internet.
But anyway, this was not at the point of discussion, but may be worth turning on whether a lawyer ... and here I am still of the opinion that there may be such cases, with very real chances.

At this point, of course, be any other opinion, what am under the understanding that I have not geglidet, not discourage, is to seek a lawyer.

The chosen Lazzmania comparison with the police, which has actually only "innocent" clients are in the position on this issue but rather inappropriate, because we give all the dishes after this statement, etc., since the police stops anyway only culprit / asks questions / take into custody ... etc.

More ...

Quote:
Originally posted by screwedx Post show
5) based on 3) and 4). if I paid 65 euros for NEN six months in advance and three days later, I'm spellbound I'm sure because of the 65 € for the lawyer ... But if I have a monthly subscription and three days before month end will be banned .. well, worth € 2 for the net ...
Also, this bill not as skin-out completely, since an Ace. with let's say 3 to 70 chars in T4/T5 gear, SLIGHTLY sure is worth more than 65 or 2 € ... time to think!

Quote:
Originally posted by screwedx Post show
6) As I said here, it's not a process but at least 2 different methods. And the last one (Blizz can terminate properly) would certainly be interesting ...
Even that's not the first time around. None of the emails posted here en masse contains a alternatively proper notice. NOT A SINGLE! So there is first time a procedure. "... Determine the application that the contract was not terminated by dismissal from the ... ... bla bla bla" Mabye a declaratory judgment

Whether Blizz then in the process, ordinary termination auspricht, is pure conjecture on your part. I could well imagine that they just do not for political reasons because that would be a signal to all players: Look here, we can offer you your Acc. away without any reason ...

Last back is pure guesswork on my part. Now I want to go but not at the other, in my view, erroneous statements, because ...

... finally left when the smoke has cleared, noted that

a) a good Acc. sure a (sales) value of € 500, - or more, and

b.) a very high ideal qualities may have value.

Therefore:

c.) Everyone must decide for himself how he handles it in the event of a loss ... and

d) a dress, or laughing at the people that pull out the consideration is inappropriate. QED

So long!
I help, then pleased a + rep!

Last edited by Northern War (15.10.2008 to 16: 00 (Watch)
Reply with quote
 
ALT October 18, 2008
Avatar by DRonin
Registered since: Feb 2008
Contributions: 148
Location: caught in the Undercity
 
Members

Offline
Screw you you participate?

I will pay the first of the Blizzard Account Ban sued for € 100.
If even one person can join in the same 200, 300 etc get,
we do not want to make a pot?

Requirements:
  • On the account was not geglided
  • You have clear evidence for your claim
signed DRonin - walkin in a brainfucked world
Solo Gilding: Hunter level 70 just farming
Party gliding: Shaman level 23 22 k / h

Standard - the new standard

Last edited by Dronin (18/10/2008 to 23: 18 Clock) Reason: abo
Reply with quote
 
ALT October 18, 2008
Avatar by Mr. Jones
Registered since: Jul 2008
Contributions: 707
 
Members

Offline
Quote:
Originally posted by DRonin Post show
Screw you you participate?

I will pay the first of the Blizzard Account Ban sued for € 100.
If even one person can join in the same 200, 300 etc get,
we do not want to make a pot?

Requirements:
  • On the account was not geglided
  • You have clear evidence for your claim
Um with the two criteria will you poor!
Reply with quote
 
ALT October 19, 2008
Avatar by curieL
Registered since: Sep 2007
Contributions: 114
Location: Amsterdam
 
Members

Offline
Allso I've lätztens with a GM about gold transfer talk
I share my Wolte warhammer acc for gold because I have the
asked gm if my acc is banned whom a buddy sent me 5000g
He said no, it 's about where the gold is and how much the other
player in gold and there are of course übrich has made investigations as the
has been made gold

Mer I have not made him get out-_-
Reply with quote
 
ALT October 19, 2008
Avatar by DRonin
Registered since: Feb 2008
Contributions: 148
Location: caught in the Undercity
 
Members

Offline
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr. Jones. Post show
Um with the two criteria will you poor!
No why. Here is crying in a tour and threatened with lawyers, but
gabs have a complaint? No it was not. And I can not be poor
for _the Erste_ and 100 € ... God knows that I do not hurt. When
what one expects to lose by a ban:

WOW, BC, 1-2 month season, there is also no poor and most of
gliding longer than 2 months before you are banned. On my account
I'm at 56 € with 2 months.
signed DRonin - walkin in a brainfucked world
Solo Gilding: Hunter level 70 just farming
Party gliding: Shaman level 23 22 k / h

Standard - the new standard
Reply with quote

Welcome back
Forums Statistics
Members: 54,125
Threads: 35,506
Posts: 187,396

Newest member: dizzyshtolze5767
Advertising